cut: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
get hot 0.96
feel hot 0.92
be cooked in hot liquid 0.82
exposed to things like hot sauce 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cut, is hot)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cut, get hot)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, get hot)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cut, get hot)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cut, feel hot)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cut, feel hot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cut, feel hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cut, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tenderloin, is hot)