cuticle: be important to plants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.58
, body
Weight: 0.49
, layer
Weight: 0.42
, structure
Weight: 0.42
, thing
Weight: 0.41
Siblings bone tissue
Weight: 0.35
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.35
, hair follicle
Weight: 0.35
, bone cell
Weight: 0.34
, skin
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to plants 1.00
be important to plant 0.92
be useful adaptation in plants 0.83
be very thick in plants 0.82
be very thick in aquatic plants 0.82
be thicker in aquatic plants 0.80
be thicker in plants 0.79
be very thick in desert plants 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tissue, be important to plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cuticle, be important to plants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tissue, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cuticle, be important to plants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important to plants)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tissue, be important to plant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important to plant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be important to plants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(tissue, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(tissue, be important to plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cuticle, be important to plants)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cuticle, be important to plant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cuticle, be important to plant)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be important to plant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cuticle, be very thick in aquatic plants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cuticle, be very thick in plants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cuticle, be useful adaptation in plants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cuticle, be thicker in aquatic plants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be very thick in aquatic plants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(cuticle, be thicker in plants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be very thick in plants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cuticle, be very thick in desert plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cuticle, be very thick in plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cuticle, be very thick in aquatic plants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cuticle, be useful adaptation in plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be useful adaptation in plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cuticle, be thicker in plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cuticle, be thicker in aquatic plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be thicker in aquatic plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be very thick in desert plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cuticle, be thicker in plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be very thick in aquatic plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be very thick in desert plants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cuticle, be very thick in desert plants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be very thick in plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be thicker in aquatic plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be useful adaptation in plants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be thicker in plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cuticle, be important to plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plants)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plants)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(cuticle, be important to plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tissue, be important to plant)