cutting: affect forest fires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect forest fires 1.00
be down help forests 0.82
be rainforest for roads bad for plants 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cutting, affect forest fires)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cutting, be down help forests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(cutting, be down help forests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(cutting, be down help forests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be down help forests)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cutting, be rainforest for roads bad for plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cutting, affect forest fires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(cutting, affect forest fires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cutting, affect forest fires)