cutting: effect animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.59
, process
Weight: 0.59
, work
Weight: 0.56
, act
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cut
Weight: 0.35
, trimming
Weight: 0.33
, scaling
Weight: 0.33
, shaving
Weight: 0.33
, trim
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
effect animals 1.00
have impact on animals 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cutting, effect animals)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cutting, have impact on animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cutting, have impact on animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(cutting, have impact on animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cutting, have impact on animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cutting, effect animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(cutting, effect animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(cutting, effect animals)