cycle: be more dangerous than drive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
Siblings carbon
Weight: 0.60
, rinse
Weight: 0.43
, period
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.32
, wave
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more dangerous than drive 1.00
be more efficient than drive 0.88
be more efficient than walk 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cycle, be more efficient than walk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than walk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than walk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than walk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)