cycle: be more efficient than drive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
Siblings carbon
Weight: 0.60
, rinse
Weight: 0.43
, period
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.32
, wave
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than drive 1.00
be more efficient than walk 0.96
be more dangerous than drive 0.88
be more than watch measurement 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(time, be more than watch measurement)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(time, be more than watch measurement)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(time, be more than watch measurement)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(time, be more than watch measurement)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cycle, be more efficient than drive)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cycle, be more efficient than walk)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than walk)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than walk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than walk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(time, be more than watch measurement)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(time, be more than watch measurement)