cycle: be more efficient than walk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pattern
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
Siblings carbon
Weight: 0.60
, rinse
Weight: 0.43
, period
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.32
, wave
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient than walk 1.00
be more efficient than drive 0.96
be more dangerous than drive 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(cycle, be more efficient than walk)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than drive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more dangerous than drive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cycle, be more efficient than walk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cycle, be more efficient than walk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cycle, be more efficient than walk)