cycling: be popular in copenhagen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in copenhagen 1.00
be popular in colombia 0.82
be popular in france 0.82
be popular in netherlands 0.80
is popular 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sport, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sport, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sport, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(skateboarding, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sport, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(snowboarding, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(skateboarding, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(skateboarding, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in france)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in france)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cycling, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(cycling, is popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cycling, is popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in france)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sport, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(snowboarding, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skateboarding, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sport, is popular)