cycling: be popular in netherlands

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in netherlands 1.00
be popular in colombia 0.83
be popular in france 0.81
be popular in copenhagen 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in netherlands)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in france)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in france)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in colombia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in france)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in copenhagen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be popular in netherlands)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cycling, be popular in netherlands)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cycling, be popular in netherlands)