cycling: burn calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
burn calories 1.00
burn many calories 0.98
burn most calories 0.98
burn few calories 0.96
burn fat 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(cycling, burn calories)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cycling, burn most calories)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cycling, burn most calories)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(cycling, burn most calories)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cycling, burn few calories)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cycling, burn few calories)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cycling, burn fat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cycling, burn few calories)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cycling, burn fat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cycling, burn fat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cycling, burn many calories)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cycling, burn many calories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cycling, burn many calories)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cycling, burn most calories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cycling, burn many calories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cycling, burn few calories)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cycling, burn fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cycling, burn calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(cycling, burn calories)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cycling, burn calories)