cycling: is better running

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better running 1.00
is faster running 0.91
is easier running 0.89
is harder running 0.89
better is running spinning 0.88
has state running 0.87
be compared to running 0.83
is better walking 0.79
be much easier walking 0.77
is better driving 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cycling, is better running)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cycling, is harder running)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cycling, is better walking)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(cycling, is better walking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better walking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is easier running)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cycling, is easier running)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cycling, has state running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cycling, has state running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cycling, has state running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cycling, is easier running)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cycling, is better walking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cycling, is harder running)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be compared to running)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is faster running)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cycling, is easier running)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cycling, be compared to running)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cycling, has state running)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cycling, is faster running)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better driving)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(cycling, is better driving)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cycling, be compared to running)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cycling, is better driving)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cycling, is faster running)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cycling, be compared to running)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cycling, is faster running)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cycling, is better driving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better running)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cycling, is better running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cycling, is better running)