cycling: is harder running

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.64
, hobby
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bicycling
Weight: 0.37
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.35
, skateboarding
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harder running 1.00
is easier running 0.93
is better running 0.89
is faster running 0.87
be much easier walking 0.82
is hard 0.82
better is running spinning 0.81
has state running 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cycling, is harder running)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(matter, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(matter, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(skateboarding, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cycling, is harder running)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(skateboarding, is hard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(skateboarding, is hard)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(snowboarding, is hard)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cycling, is harder running)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is easier running)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cycling, is easier running)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is better running)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cycling, is better running)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cycling, is better running)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cycling, is easier running)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cycling, has state running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cycling, has state running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cycling, has state running)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cycling, is easier running)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cycling, is better running)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cycling, be much easier walking)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is faster running)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(cycling, better is running spinning)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cycling, is faster running)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cycling, has state running)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cycling, is faster running)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(cycling, is faster running)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is hard)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cycling, is hard)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cycling, is hard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cycling, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cycling, is harder running)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(snowboarding, is hard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(skateboarding, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(cycling, is harder running)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)