cyclist: bicycle to work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.69
, commuter
Weight: 0.59
, road
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings swimmer
Weight: 0.36
, boxer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
bicycle to work 1.00
ride bike 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cyclist, bicycle to work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(person, bicycle to work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(person, bicycle to work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(person, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cyclist, bicycle to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(cyclist, bicycle to work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cyclist, ride bike)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, ride bike)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(cyclist, ride bike)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(cyclist, ride bike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, bicycle to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cyclist, bicycle to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(person, bicycle to work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cyclist, bicycle to work)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(person, bicycle to work)