cyclist: go through red lights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.69
, user
Weight: 0.60
, commuter
Weight: 0.59
, road
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gymnast
Weight: 0.36
, swimmer
Weight: 0.36
, boxer
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
go through red lights 1.00
go through lights 0.97
run red lights 0.94
jump red lights 0.90
ignore red lights 0.90
run lights 0.90
have flashing lights 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cyclist, go through red lights)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cyclist, run red lights)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cyclist, run red lights)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cyclist, ignore red lights)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cyclist, ignore red lights)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cyclist, run red lights)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cyclist, ignore red lights)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cyclist, jump red lights)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, ignore red lights)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cyclist, have flashing lights)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cyclist, jump red lights)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cyclist, jump red lights)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cyclist, have flashing lights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, run red lights)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cyclist, have flashing lights)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, jump red lights)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, have flashing lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, go through red lights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(cyclist, go through red lights)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cyclist, go through red lights)