dachshund: is good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.77
, small dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.64
, puppy
Weight: 0.55
, cat
Weight: 0.53
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.41
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.40
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.39
, poodle
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pets 1.00
has state pets 0.93
be called dogs 0.83
is dog 0.82
be called weiner dogs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(poodle, is dog)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(cat, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is good pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beagle, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has state pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(beagle, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(beagle, has state pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(poodle, is dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(poodle, is dog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dachshund, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(dachshund, has state pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dachshund, has state pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has state pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(dachshund, is dog)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dachshund, be called dogs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(dachshund, is dog)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(dachshund, be called dogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dachshund, is dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has state pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dachshund, be called dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dachshund, be called weiner dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dachshund, be called weiner dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dachshund, be called weiner dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, be called weiner dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, be called dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dachshund, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(poodle, is dog)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(beagle, is good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(beagle, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has state pets)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(dachshund, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)