dag: be better than blockchain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.40
, name
Weight: 0.31
, north carolina
Weight: 0.31
, computer science
Weight: 0.28
Siblings jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.30
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.30
, beatle
Weight: 0.29
, abba
Weight: 0.29
, sebastian
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than blockchain 1.00
be better than carolina 0.81
be better than information science 0.80
be better than weights 0.79
play faster live 0.79
be bigger than carolina 0.79
sound better in one order 0.78
be better than south carolina 0.78
is more expensive 0.78
is harder 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(north carolina, be bigger than carolina)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(north carolina, be better than carolina)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(north carolina, be better than south carolina)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(band, play faster live)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(band, be better than weights)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(band, be better than weights)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(band, play faster live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(north carolina, be better than south carolina)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(north carolina, be better than carolina)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(north carolina, be bigger than carolina)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, be better than weights)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(band, play faster live)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(north carolina, be better than carolina)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(north carolina, be bigger than carolina)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be better than information science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(north carolina, be better than south carolina)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(north carolina, be better than carolina)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(north carolina, be bigger than carolina)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer science, be better than information science)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(north carolina, be better than south carolina)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(band, play faster live)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(band, be better than weights)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(dag, be better than blockchain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(north carolina, be better than carolina)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(band, be better than weights)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(north carolina, be better than south carolina)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(band, play faster live)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(north carolina, be bigger than carolina)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(computer science, be better than information science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(north carolina, be better than south carolina)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(band, be better than weights)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(north carolina, be better than carolina)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(band, play faster live)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dag, be better than blockchain)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(north carolina, be bigger than carolina)