dag: has state names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.40
, name
Weight: 0.31
, north carolina
Weight: 0.31
, computer science
Weight: 0.28
Siblings jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.30
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.30
, beatle
Weight: 0.29
, abba
Weight: 0.29
, sebastian
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state names 1.00
have names 0.94
have 2 names 0.88
be family names 0.86
first are called names 0.86
have weird names 0.84
be family names created 0.83
even come up with names 0.83
be called name 0.81
differ from names 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(band, have weird names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dag, has state names)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(name, be called name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dag, has state names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(name, be called name)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(band, have weird names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(band, have weird names)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(name, be called name)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(band, have weird names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(dag, has state names)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(name, be called name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(dag, has state names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dag, has state names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dag, has state names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dag, has state names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(name, be called name)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(band, have weird names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(name, be called name)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dag, has state names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(band, have weird names)