dag: is movie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.40
, name
Weight: 0.31
, north carolina
Weight: 0.31
, computer science
Weight: 0.28
Siblings jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.30
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.30
, beatle
Weight: 0.29
, abba
Weight: 0.29
, sebastian
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is movie 1.00
be used in movies 0.86
is cinema 0.82
be reversed on movie posters 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(computer science, be used in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dag, is movie)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(name, be reversed on movie posters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dag, is movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(computer science, be used in movies)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(name, be reversed on movie posters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be used in movies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(name, be reversed on movie posters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(computer science, be used in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dag, is movie)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(name, be reversed on movie posters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dag, is movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(dag, is movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dag, is movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dag, is movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(computer science, be used in movies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(name, be reversed on movie posters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(computer science, be used in movies)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(dag, is movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(name, be reversed on movie posters)