dairy product: be bad for cats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents product
Weight: 0.76
, frozen food
Weight: 0.69
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.81
, cottage cheese
Weight: 0.74
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.74
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.74
, chocolate
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for cats 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, be bad for cats)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(coconut milk, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, be bad for cats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chocolate, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(coconut milk, be bad for cats)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chocolate, be bad for dogs)