dam: be built thicker at bottom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built thicker at bottom 1.00
need thicker on bottom at top 0.94
be built thicker than than sides 0.91
need thicker 0.90
be constructed wider at bottom 0.85
be built stronger and broader at bottom 0.84
have walls at bottom 0.81
be made at bottom 0.81
be built in deep water 0.77
is built 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bridge, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dike, is built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(levee, is built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bridge, is built)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bridge, is built)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(levee, is built)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(levee, is built)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(dike, is built)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dike, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(dam, have walls at bottom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(dam, have walls at bottom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(dam, have walls at bottom)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built stronger and broader at bottom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(dam, have walls at bottom)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(dam, be built thicker than than sides)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(dam, be built stronger and broader at bottom)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker than than sides)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dam, be built thicker than than sides)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dam, be built thicker than than sides)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(dam, be built stronger and broader at bottom)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dam, need thicker)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(dam, is built)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(dam, is built)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dam, be built stronger and broader at bottom)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dam, is built)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dam, is built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dam, need thicker)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dam, need thicker)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(dam, need thicker)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dam, be built thicker at bottom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bridge, is built)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(levee, is built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(dam, be built thicker at bottom)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dike, is built)