dam: be classified as infrastructure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as infrastructure 1.00
be classified 0.82
be known as projects 0.76
be considered resources 0.76
be referred as projects 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be considered resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dam, be classified as infrastructure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be considered resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(factor, be considered resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be classified)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be considered resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dam, be classified as infrastructure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bridge, be classified) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bridge, be classified)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dam, be classified as infrastructure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dam, be classified as infrastructure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dam, be classified as infrastructure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(factor, be considered resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bridge, be classified)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dam, be classified as infrastructure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(factor, be considered resources)