dam: be referred to to projects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred to to multi-purpose projects 1.00
be referred to to projects 1.00
be referred as projects 0.99
be called projects 0.94
be referred as project 0.93
be known as projects 0.92
is projects 0.91
be referred as multipurpose projects 0.89
be referred to to multipurpose projects 0.89
be referred as multipurpose project 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(project, be called projects)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dam, be referred to to projects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(project, be called projects)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(project, be called projects)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(project, be called projects)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(dam, be referred to to projects)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(dam, be referred to to projects)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dam, be referred to to multipurpose projects)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dam, be referred to to multi-purpose projects)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dam, be referred to to multipurpose projects)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(dam, be referred to to multi-purpose projects)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dam, be referred to to multipurpose projects)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(dam, be referred to to multipurpose projects)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dam, be referred to to multi-purpose projects)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dam, be referred to to multi-purpose projects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dam, be referred to to projects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(dam, be referred to to projects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, be called projects)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(dam, be referred to to projects)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, be called projects)