dam: is park

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is park 1.00
be in lake havasu city 0.78
be in now lake havasu city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be in now lake havasu city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bridge, be in now lake havasu city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bridge, be in now lake havasu city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(dam, is park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dam, is park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(dam, is park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dam, is park)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bridge, be in now lake havasu city)