dam: were used in mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, site
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings bridge
Weight: 0.35
, construction site
Weight: 0.34
, dike
Weight: 0.34
, levee
Weight: 0.33
, creek
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used in mesopotamia 1.00
is used for 0.86
be in use of incoterms 2000 0.81
were necessary 0.81
were created 0.80
were first invented 0.80
were invented 0.79
being are opened 0.79
is are removed 0.78
be in whiterun 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barrier, be in use of incoterms 2000)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(barrier, be in use of incoterms 2000)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barrier, be in use of incoterms 2000)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were first invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barrier, be in use of incoterms 2000)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(bridge, were necessary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bridge, were necessary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bridge, were invented)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bridge, were invented)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(bridge, were first invented)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bridge, were first invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dam, were used in mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(dam, is used for)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dam, is used for)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dam, is used for)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(dam, being are opened)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dam, being are opened)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dam, being are opened)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(dam, is are removed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dam, is are removed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dam, were created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dam, is are removed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dam, were created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(dam, being are opened)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dam, were created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dam, is are removed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dam, were created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(dam, is used for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(barrier, be in use of incoterms 2000)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bridge, were necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bridge, were invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bridge, were first invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dam, were used in mesopotamia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(barrier, be in use of incoterms 2000)