damage: be calculated for chakrams

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hazard
Weight: 0.63
, abnormality
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, sum
Weight: 0.57
Siblings rust
Weight: 0.63
, breaking
Weight: 0.59
, erosion
Weight: 0.58
, tear
Weight: 0.57
, windshield
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated for chakrams 1.00
be calculated in ttk 0.99
be calculated 0.99
get calculated 0.97
be calculated with with vyr 0.95
be actually calculated 0.95
be calculated over time 0.94
be calculated in life 2 0.91
be taken calculated 0.91
be calculated in groups 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(damage, be calculated in ttk)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(damage, be calculated in ttk)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(damage, be calculated in ttk)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(damage, be actually calculated)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(damage, be calculated)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(damage, be actually calculated)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(damage, be actually calculated)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(damage, be taken calculated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated in ttk)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(damage, be taken calculated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(damage, be calculated with with vyr)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(damage, be calculated with with vyr)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(damage, be calculated with with vyr)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(damage, be actually calculated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(damage, be calculated in groups)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(damage, be calculated in groups)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(damage, be calculated in groups)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(damage, be calculated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(damage, be taken calculated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated in groups)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated with with vyr)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(damage, be calculated over time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated over time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(damage, be calculated over time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(damage, be calculated over time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(damage, be taken calculated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(damage, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(damage, be calculated for chakrams)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(damage, be calculated for chakrams)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(damage, be calculated for chakrams)