dan: be from big brother wearing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.58
, musician
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.33
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from big brother wearing 1.00
be from brother wearing 0.98
be from big brother 0.92
be in big brother 0.91
be on big brother 0.91
be from brother 0.88
be in big brother house 0.88
be on brother 0.87
be in brother 0.87
be in brother house 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dan, be from brother wearing)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dan, be from brother wearing)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dan, be from brother wearing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dan, be from big brother)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dan, be from big brother)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dan, be in big brother)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dan, be on big brother)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dan, be in big brother)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dan, be on big brother)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dan, be from big brother)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dan, be in big brother)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dan, be on big brother)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dan, be from brother)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dan, be in big brother house)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dan, be in big brother house)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dan, be from brother)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dan, be in brother)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dan, be in brother)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dan, be in big brother house)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(dan, be in brother)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dan, be from brother)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dan, be in brother house)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dan, be in brother house)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dan, be in brother house)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dan, be from brother wearing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in big brother house)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in big brother)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in brother)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dan, be on big brother)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in brother house)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(dan, be from big brother)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(dan, be from brother)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dan, be from big brother wearing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dan, be from big brother wearing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dan, be from big brother wearing)