dan: be in fair city in wheelchair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.58
, musician
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.33
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in fair city in wheelchair 1.00
be in city in wheelchair 0.94
be in fair city 0.84
be in city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in city in wheelchair)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(dan, be in city in wheelchair)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dan, be in city in wheelchair)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dan, be in city in wheelchair)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dan, be in fair city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dan, be in city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(dan, be in city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dan, be in fair city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(dan, be in city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dan, be in fair city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in fair city)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dan, be in fair city in wheelchair)