dan: be omitted in revelation 7

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.58
, musician
Weight: 0.58
, man
Weight: 0.57
, artist
Weight: 0.53
, person
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jesse james
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, john smith
Weight: 0.33
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be omitted in revelation 7 1.00
be excluded in revelation 0.88
miss from revelation 7 0.87
be left out of revelation 7 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(dan, be omitted in revelation 7)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dan, be left out of revelation 7)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dan, be left out of revelation 7)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(dan, be left out of revelation 7)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(dan, be left out of revelation 7)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dan, be excluded in revelation)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(dan, miss from revelation 7)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dan, miss from revelation 7)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dan, miss from revelation 7)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dan, be excluded in revelation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(dan, miss from revelation 7)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dan, be excluded in revelation)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dan, be excluded in revelation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(dan, be omitted in revelation 7)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(dan, be omitted in revelation 7) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dan, be omitted in revelation 7)