dancer: have long necks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.73
, woman
Weight: 0.63
, athlete
Weight: 0.63
, musician
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.79
, ballet dancer
Weight: 0.51
, barre
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long necks 1.00
have small chests 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have long necks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have long necks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have long necks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ballerina, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have long necks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have small chests)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have small chests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dancer, have long necks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have small chests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(dancer, have small chests)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dancer, have small chests)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dancer, have small chests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(dancer, have long necks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ballerina, have long necks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have small chests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have long necks)