dancing: embarassing in 2016

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents entertainment
Weight: 0.64
, act
Weight: 0.61
, way
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings dance
Weight: 0.36
, singing
Weight: 0.35
, folk music
Weight: 0.34
, music
Weight: 0.34
, loud music
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
embarassing in 2016 1.00
is embarrassing 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(singing, is embarrassing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(singing, is embarrassing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(singing, is embarrassing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(dancing, embarassing in 2016)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(dancing, is embarrassing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dancing, is embarrassing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dancing, is embarrassing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dancing, is embarrassing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dancing, embarassing in 2016)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dancing, embarassing in 2016)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dancing, embarassing in 2016)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(singing, is embarrassing)