danger: affect decision

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents warning
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.59
Siblings concern
Weight: 0.68
, debris
Weight: 0.62
, pollution
Weight: 0.59
, frostbite
Weight: 0.58
, fear
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect decision 1.00
affect managerial decision 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fear, affect managerial decision)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fear, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fear, affect managerial decision)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(danger, affect decision)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(danger, affect managerial decision)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(danger, affect managerial decision)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect managerial decision)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(danger, affect managerial decision)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect decision)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(danger, affect decision)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect decision)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fear, affect managerial decision)