danger: affect managerial decision

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents warning
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.62
, risk
Weight: 0.59
Siblings concern
Weight: 0.68
, debris
Weight: 0.62
, pollution
Weight: 0.59
, frostbite
Weight: 0.58
, fear
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect managerial decision 1.00
affect decision 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fear, affect managerial decision)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fear, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(fear, affect managerial decision)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(danger, affect managerial decision)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(danger, affect decision)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(danger, affect decision)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(danger, affect decision)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect decision)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect managerial decision)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(danger, affect managerial decision)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(danger, affect managerial decision)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fear, affect managerial decision)