dark meat: have more calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.51
, food
Weight: 0.50
, cooking
Weight: 0.44
, chicken
Weight: 0.42
Siblings beef
Weight: 0.65
, venison
Weight: 0.55
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.35
, pork
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more calories 1.00
have calories 0.99
have more fat 0.81
has physical part fat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dark meat, have more calories)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meat, have more fat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(meat, have more fat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meat, have more fat)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(dark meat, have more calories)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dark meat, have calories)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dark meat, have calories)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(dark meat, have more fat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(dark meat, have more fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have more fat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(dark meat, have calories)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dark meat, have more fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(dark meat, has physical part fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(dark meat, has physical part fat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dark meat, has physical part fat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, has physical part fat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have calories)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dark meat, have more calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meat, have more fat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(dark meat, have more calories)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meat, have more fat)