dart: be dangerous for young child

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents competition
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.53
, sport
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.52
Siblings soccer ball
Weight: 0.31
, catch
Weight: 0.31
, frisbee
Weight: 0.31
, football game
Weight: 0.30
, tennis game
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous for young child 1.00
be good for child 0.86
be dangerous 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sport, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dart, be dangerous for young child)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dart, be dangerous for young child)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sport, be good for child)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sport, be dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(sport, be dangerous)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sport, be good for child)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(sport, be good for child)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dart, be dangerous for young child)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(sport, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dart, be dangerous for young child)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dart, be dangerous for young child)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dart, be dangerous for young child)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sport, be good for child)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sport, be good for child)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dart, be dangerous for young child)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sport, be dangerous)