data: have cruel science interviews

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resource
Weight: 0.53
, service
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, form
Weight: 0.47
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, statistics
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32
, database
Weight: 0.32
, mapping
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cruel science interviews 1.00
be science 0.76
science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(data, have cruel science interviews)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(data, be science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(data, science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(data, be science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(data, science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(data, be science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(data, science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(data, be science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(data, science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(data, have cruel science interviews)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(data, have cruel science interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(data, have cruel science interviews)