database: be important to organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.61
, search engine
Weight: 0.60
Siblings world wide web
Weight: 0.64
, xml
Weight: 0.62
, php
Weight: 0.61
, collection
Weight: 0.59
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organization 1.00
be important for organization 0.99
be critical to organizations 0.82
be useful in organizations 0.81
be important in e-business 0.77
be important for business 0.76
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(spreadsheet, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(database, be important to organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(spreadsheet, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(database, be important to organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(database, be important to organization)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(database, be important for organization)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(database, be important for organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(database, be important for organization)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(database, be important for organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(database, be important in e-business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(database, be useful in organizations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(database, be important in e-business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(database, be important in e-business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(database, be useful in organizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(database, be critical to organizations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(database, be useful in organizations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(database, be critical to organizations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(database, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(database, be important in e-business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(database, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, be critical to organizations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(database, be important for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(database, be important for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(database, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, be important in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(database, be critical to organizations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(database, be important for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(database, be useful in organizations)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(database, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(database, be important to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(database, be important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(database, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be important for business)