date: be better than sugar

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents record
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings list
Weight: 0.60
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, beginning
Weight: 0.59
, may
Weight: 0.58
, december
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than sugar 1.00
have sugar 0.92
be high in sugar 0.89
be stronger than steel evidence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(date, be better than sugar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(date, be better than sugar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(date, be better than sugar)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(date, be high in sugar)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(date, be high in sugar)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(date, be high in sugar)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(date, be high in sugar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(date, be better than sugar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(date, be better than sugar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(date, be better than sugar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(evidence, be stronger than steel evidence)