date: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents record
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings list
Weight: 0.60
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, beginning
Weight: 0.59
, may
Weight: 0.58
, december
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
find expensive 0.89
is cheaper 0.85
cost money 0.77
is attractive clickbait 0.76
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(list, is attractive clickbait)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(appointment, cost money)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(list, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(appointment, cost money)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(appointment, cost money)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(list, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(list, is attractive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(list, is attractive clickbait)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(list, is attractive clickbait)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(date, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(date, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(appointment, cost money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(list, is attractive clickbait)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(date, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(list, is attractive)