daughter: be harsh on fathers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harsh on fathers 1.00
be with fathers 0.86
hate fathers 0.86
need fathers 0.85
be close to fathers 0.84
love much fathers 0.84
fall with fathers 0.83
love fathers 0.83
love more fathers 0.83
prefer fathers 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(son, hate fathers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(son, need fathers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(son, hate fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, hate fathers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, need fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, need fathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, hate fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, hate fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(daughter, hate fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, need fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, need fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, love fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, love more fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, love fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, love more fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, need fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love more fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(daughter, love much fathers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(daughter, love much fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, need fathers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, hate fathers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(daughter, love much fathers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(daughter, love more fathers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, love fathers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(daughter, love much fathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daughter, be harsh on fathers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, hate fathers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be harsh on fathers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(son, need fathers)