daughter: be with absent fathers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with absent fathers 1.00
be with absent fathers affected 0.96
be with absent fathers affected emotionally 0.91
be with fathers 0.90
need fathers 0.88
fall with fathers 0.87
be with fathers affected 0.87
hate fathers 0.86
be close to fathers 0.86
prefer fathers 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(son, need fathers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(son, hate fathers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(son, need fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, need fathers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(son, hate fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(son, hate fathers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, need fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, hate fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(daughter, hate fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(daughter, hate fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(daughter, need fathers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, fall with fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(daughter, need fathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(daughter, need fathers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers affected emotionally)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, be with fathers affected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, be close to fathers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(daughter, prefer fathers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(daughter, hate fathers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(daughter, fall with fathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(daughter, be with absent fathers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(son, need fathers)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(daughter, be with absent fathers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(son, hate fathers)