daughter: has knees crack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has knees crack 1.00
has knees 0.92
has legs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(son, has knees)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(son, has legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(son, has knees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(son, has knees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(son, has legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(son, has legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(daughter, has knees crack)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(daughter, has knees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daughter, has legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(daughter, has knees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(daughter, has knees)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(daughter, has legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(daughter, has legs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(daughter, has knees crack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(son, has knees)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(son, has legs)