daughter: has legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young woman
Weight: 0.78
, young girl
Weight: 0.76
, girl
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.65
Siblings son
Weight: 0.68
, grandmother
Weight: 0.66
, wife
Weight: 0.64
, bride
Weight: 0.61
, kate
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
has legs 1.00
has knees 0.81
has knees crack 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(son, has knees)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(son, has legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(son, has legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(son, has legs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(son, has knees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(son, has knees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(daughter, has legs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has knees crack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(daughter, has knees crack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(daughter, has knees)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(daughter, has knees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(daughter, has knees crack)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(daughter, has knees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(daughter, has knees crack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(daughter, has legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(son, has legs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(daughter, has legs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(son, has knees)