david: was such important king to israelites

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents friend
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.61
, guest
Weight: 0.59
, hero
Weight: 0.59
Siblings henry david thoreau
Weight: 0.37
, paul mccartney
Weight: 0.36
, william james
Weight: 0.36
, paul
Weight: 0.36
, gordon
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was such important king to israelites 1.00
was known as king 0.91
is good king 0.91
is israelite king 0.90
is great king 0.90
is great israelite king 0.90
was known as greatest king 0.88
was chosen as king 0.87
has state king 0.87
was anointed king in charge 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(david, is great israelite king)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(david, is great israelite king)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(david, has state king)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(david, is great israelite king)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(david, was chosen as king)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(david, was known as greatest king)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(david, has state king)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(david, was known as greatest king)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(david, was chosen as king)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(david, has state king)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(david, was chosen as king)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(david, was known as greatest king)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(david, was anointed king in charge)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(david, was anointed king in charge)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(david, was anointed king in charge)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(david, is great israelite king)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(david, was known as greatest king)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(david, was chosen as king)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(david, was anointed king in charge)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(david, has state king)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(david, was such important king to israelites)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(david, was such important king to israelites)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(david, was such important king to israelites)