dc: be better than ac

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, washington
Weight: 0.34
, voltage
Weight: 0.34
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, cleveland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than ac 1.00
more is dangerous than ac 0.93
less is dangerous than ac 0.92
be dangerous than ac 0.92
more is efficient than ac 0.92
more is powerful than ac 0.92
be used instead of ac 0.90
be safer than ac 0.89
be preferred over ac 0.87
more is dangerous than ac from shock 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, be better than ac)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dc, be safer than ac)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dc, be preferred over ac)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, be safer than ac)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dc, be preferred over ac)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dc, be safer than ac)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dc, be preferred over ac)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dc, be safer than ac)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dc, be preferred over ac)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dc, be better than ac)