dc: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, washington
Weight: 0.34
, voltage
Weight: 0.34
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, cleveland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
is state 0.91
want state 0.83
be called district 0.79
has state dark 0.75
be under state of emergency 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(las vegas, be called state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(las vegas, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dc, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(dc, be called district)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(dc, be called district)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(dc, be called district)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dc, has state dark)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(dc, has state dark)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dc, be under state of emergency)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dc, has state dark)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dc, be under state of emergency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(dc, be under state of emergency)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dc, be called district)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(dc, has state dark)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be under state of emergency)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dc, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dc, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dc, be called state)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(las vegas, be called state)