dc: be dangerous than ac

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.55
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.34
, washington
Weight: 0.34
, voltage
Weight: 0.34
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, cleveland
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous than ac 1.00
more is dangerous than ac 0.98
less is dangerous than ac 0.97
be better than ac 0.92
more is powerful than ac 0.91
more is dangerous than ac from shock 0.90
more is efficient than ac 0.88
be safer than ac 0.88
be used instead of ac 0.88
more is dangerous than ac from electric shock 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is dangerous than ac)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dc, be better than ac)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, be better than ac)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dc, less is dangerous than ac)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dc, be better than ac)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(dc, be better than ac)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dc, be safer than ac)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dc, be safer than ac)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is powerful than ac)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(dc, more is dangerous than ac from electric shock)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is dangerous than ac from electric shock)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dc, more is efficient than ac)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dc, be used instead of ac)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dc, more is dangerous than ac from electric shock)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dc, be safer than ac)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dc, be safer than ac)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(dc, more is dangerous than ac from electric shock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(dc, be dangerous than ac)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(dc, be dangerous than ac) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(dc, be dangerous than ac)