deaf people: communicate in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents everyone
Weight: 0.55
, culture
Weight: 0.45
, group
Weight: 0.39
, college
Weight: 0.35
, part
Weight: 0.32
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.34
, poor people
Weight: 0.29
, folk music
Weight: 0.29
, children
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
communicate in workplace 1.00
communicate with animals 0.82
communicate during sex 0.82
communicate in dark 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(deaf people, communicate in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(deaf people, communicate with animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(deaf people, communicate with animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, communicate with animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(deaf people, communicate with animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(deaf people, communicate in dark)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(deaf people, communicate in dark)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(deaf people, communicate in dark)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, communicate in dark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, communicate in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(deaf people, communicate in workplace)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(deaf people, communicate in workplace)