deaf people: know at door

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents everyone
Weight: 0.55
, culture
Weight: 0.45
, group
Weight: 0.39
, college
Weight: 0.35
, part
Weight: 0.32
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.34
, poor people
Weight: 0.29
, folk music
Weight: 0.29
, children
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
know at door 1.00
know at when door 0.98
know when stop 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(blind people, know when stop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(blind people, know when stop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(blind people, know when stop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(deaf people, know at door)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, know at when door)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(deaf people, know at when door)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(deaf people, know at when door)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deaf people, know at when door)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, know when stop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(deaf people, know when stop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(deaf people, know when stop)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(deaf people, know when stop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, know at door)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(deaf people, know at door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(deaf people, know at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blind people, know when stop)