deal: was cancelled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents acquisition
Weight: 0.65
, partnership
Weight: 0.62
, package
Weight: 0.62
, contract
Weight: 0.59
Siblings merger
Weight: 0.69
, plea bargain
Weight: 0.65
, trade
Weight: 0.65
, free
Weight: 0.58
, breakthrough
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
was cancelled 1.00
was important to egyptians 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(trade, was important to egyptians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(trade, was important to egyptians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(deal, was cancelled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deal, was cancelled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(deal, was cancelled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deal, was cancelled)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(trade, was important to egyptians)