dealer: be favored in blackjack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.66
, shop
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drug dealer
Weight: 0.36
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be favored in blackjack 1.00
be in blackjack 0.94
win in blackjack 0.92
win blackjack 0.92
have advantage in blackjack 0.92
burn cards in casinos 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dealer, be in blackjack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(dealer, win blackjack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dealer, be in blackjack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be in blackjack)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(dealer, be in blackjack)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dealer, win blackjack)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(dealer, burn cards in casinos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(dealer, win blackjack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(dealer, win blackjack)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dealer, win in blackjack)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dealer, have advantage in blackjack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be favored in blackjack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dealer, be favored in blackjack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dealer, be favored in blackjack)